LisaShea Forum Logo
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Matthew 12:40 #425971
01/10/13 01:41 PM
01/10/13 01:41 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 55
R
rstrats Offline OP
Regular
rstrats  Offline OP
Regular
R
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 55
Whenever the three days and three nights of Matthew 12:40 is brought up in a "discussion" with 6th day crucifixion folks, they frequently argue that it is a Jewish idiom for counting any part of a day as a whole day. I wonder if anyone has documentation that shows that a phrase stating a specific number of days as well as a specific number of nights was ever used in the first century or before when it didn't include at least parts of the specific number of days and at least parts of the specific number of nights?

(Lisa just repaired broken quotes)

Last edited by Lisa Shea; 01/30/14 08:23 AM.
Re: Matthew 12:40 [Re: rstrats] #425986
01/14/13 06:51 AM
01/14/13 06:51 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,307
bude , cornwall
janimal Offline
Tin Star Soulmate
janimal  Offline
Tin Star Soulmate
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,307
bude , cornwall
hmmmm.

does it matter, since being swallowed by a whale is not going to be survivable beyond a few minutes, provided you haven't been chewed up along the way?


It's All got to go!!!

BudeStrings Music Tuition
Re: Matthew 12:40 [Re: janimal] #425996
01/17/13 08:17 AM
01/17/13 08:17 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 55
R
rstrats Offline OP
Regular
rstrats  Offline OP
Regular
R
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 55
janimal,

re: "hmmmm. does it matter...?"


It does to those who argue for a 6th day crucifixion and 1st day resurrection.

Last edited by rstrats; 01/17/13 08:20 AM.
Re: Matthew 12:40 [Re: rstrats] #425997
01/17/13 10:07 AM
01/17/13 10:07 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,307
bude , cornwall
janimal Offline
Tin Star Soulmate
janimal  Offline
Tin Star Soulmate
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,307
bude , cornwall
would you care to elaborate?

you seem to be alluding to a literal interpretation of bible chronology, which seems purely academic unless you are seriously going to argue in favour of young earth creationism...

beyond which this seems to be about the resurrection of the worlds favourite fictional character. for my own part the bible is so full of glaring inconsistencies and contradictions that pedantry like this seems rather pointless to me.

so - do you accept the bible is inconsistent, or are you a young earth creationist?


It's All got to go!!!

BudeStrings Music Tuition
Re: Matthew 12:40 [Re: rstrats] #425998
01/17/13 10:25 AM
01/17/13 10:25 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 55
R
rstrats Offline OP
Regular
rstrats  Offline OP
Regular
R
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 55
janimal,

re: "would you care to elaborate?"

I think I did that in the OP.



re: "you seem to be alluding to a literal interpretation of bible chronology..."

That would be correct with regard to Matthew 12:40. However, if there is writing from the first century or before that shows otherwise, I would very much like to see it.



re: "..., which seems purely academic unless you are seriously going to argue in favour of young earth creationism..."

I don't know what that has to do with the OP, but I'm not.




re: "so - do you accept the bible is inconsistent..."

It certainly seems to be from time to time.




re: "...are you a young earth creationist?"

I have no belief - a conviction - one way or the other with regard to that.

Re: Matthew 12:40 [Re: rstrats] #426001
01/17/13 02:07 PM
01/17/13 02:07 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,307
bude , cornwall
janimal Offline
Tin Star Soulmate
janimal  Offline
Tin Star Soulmate
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,307
bude , cornwall
yes, we'd all like to see some texts from the first century, but they are spectacularly thin on the ground. the vatican has seen to that. beyond that you would have to look for detailed explanations of chronology in those texts, which is something which by and large does not exist in 'biblical' texts.

it is relevant to the young earth view because the bible chronology is either absolute throughout the book, or a phantasm which can be disregarded at large. i do not think there is any middle ground. therefore if young earth creationism is incorrect (which to my mind is the only sane interpretation) then any argument about chronology in the bible is a mute one.

the bible is spectacularly inconsistent, which is to be expected from a book compiled on grounds of agenda and politics rather than historical chronicle. i see no reason to take it more seriously than morte d'artur or the hobbit.


It's All got to go!!!

BudeStrings Music Tuition
Re: Matthew 12:40 [Re: rstrats] #426081
02/09/13 11:38 AM
02/09/13 11:38 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 55
R
rstrats Offline OP
Regular
rstrats  Offline OP
Regular
R
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 55
Since it's been awhile, perhaps someone new looking in will know of some writing.

Re: Matthew 12:40 [Re: rstrats] #426338
05/01/13 06:23 PM
05/01/13 06:23 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 55
R
rstrats Offline OP
Regular
rstrats  Offline OP
Regular
R
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 55
I probably should have addressed the OP to those who think that the crucifixion took place on the 6th day of the week.

Re: Matthew 12:40 [Re: rstrats] #426460
05/25/13 04:36 AM
05/25/13 04:36 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,407
England
somsuj Offline
Best Friend
somsuj  Offline
Best Friend
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,407
England
I guess you are referring to the belief in some communities that crucifixion took place on Wednesday, burial on Thursday and resurrection on Sunday . . . as if Crucifixion took place on Friday, it is not exactly 3 nights and 3 days Jesus was in the 'belly' of earth.

I am not aware of any contemporary Jewish writing that confirms the fact that part of days were counted towards whole days.


Believe in nothing unless it agrees with your own reason, knowledge & common sense
Be good, do good
Re: Matthew 12:40 [Re: rstrats] #426463
05/25/13 07:13 AM
05/25/13 07:13 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 55
R
rstrats Offline OP
Regular
rstrats  Offline OP
Regular
R
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 55



somsuj,

re: "I guess you are referring to the belief in some communities that crucifixion took place on Wednesday, burial on Thursday and resurrection on Sunday..."


No, and I'm not aware of any 4th day of the week crucifixion proponents who think the resurrection took place on the first day of the week.



re: "I am not aware of any contemporary Jewish writing that confirms the fact that part of days were counted towards whole days."

That's ok beccause that is not what I'm looking for.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Lisa Shea 

Search

Latest Posts
Deadpool 2
by Nathan Lee. 06/11/18 08:52 AM
Lucifer Series Cancelled
by Nathan Lee. 06/11/18 08:49 AM
Parakeet Beak/Face problem
by Nathan Lee. 06/11/18 08:47 AM
New Parakeet
by Markedg. 06/05/18 06:41 PM
Free Online Watercolor Courses
by Lisa Shea. 05/28/18 10:51 PM
Is the Holy Grail in Spain?
by Lisa Shea. 05/28/18 10:47 PM
Parakeets and Travel
by Lisa Shea. 05/28/18 01:04 PM
Name Animals Beginning with A
by Lisa Shea. 05/28/18 12:56 PM
Zoo Mysteries
by Lisa Shea. 05/28/18 12:46 PM
Repairing Chewing Damage
by Lisa Shea. 05/28/18 07:57 AM
Privacy Policy
This forum uses cookies to ensure smooth navigation from page to page of a thread. If you choose to register and provide your email, that email is solely used to get your password to you. Nothing else. Ask with any questions!
Forum Areas
General Discussion
Books, TV, Movies
Da Vinci Code
Dreams
Japanese Culture
Life, Universe, Everything
Online Courses
Politics
Religious Research
Show Your Own Work
Work From Home / Writing

Parakeets
General Parakeet Chat
Keet Stories and Photos
Parakeet Photo Gallery
Budgie Training
Health and Medical Issues
Parakeet Breeding
In Memory Of ...
Non-Budgie Pets and Animals
Non-Budgie Animal Photos
Off-Topic for Keet Owners
Games
Animal Rights
Bird / Animal Books

Subscribe
Forum Guidelines
This forum takes web safety issues very seriously. Please make sure you have read and understood our Forum Guidelines before posting.
Sponsored Link
Support Our Friends
The Animal Rescue Site
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1